I went to see Invictus a couple days ago, and it was a really good movie. You should go see it. It's about Nelson Mandela and rugby!
The movie portrays South Africa during and immediately after apartheid. I was thinking how South Africa is one of, if not the most, developed country in Africa, and how the white parts of South Africa were (and still are) really developed. It reminded me of how Dr. George would always say in her Social Change and Development class at Gordon that "the Third World is to be found in the First, and the First in the Third."
In the movie, it is painfully obvious that it doesn't matter how developed a country is if that development is limited to a certain portion of the population, i.e. whites in South Africa. Another thing Dr. George always said, along the same lines as the quote above, is that the term "developed nation" is not an accurate term, and it is even misleading. It implies that America has made it, and has no where to go, and is what all nations should strive to be. What Americans have is what they should want.
But, what good is development in America if it is restricted to certain economic classes? What good is it to have good hospitals and medicine if millions can't afford it? Apartheid is a comfortable enough subject for movies because the injustice is obvious. Institutionalized racism is wrong. Everyone agrees. But what about institutionalized classism? [Disclaimer: I'm not saying America is as bad as apartheid SA, don't get carried away...]
Where Invictus causes the right questions, movies like Pursuit of Happyness give the wrong answers. Pursuit tells the story of a statistical outlier, but it pervades the consciousness of American cultural expectations for what the poor "should" be able to achieve if only they "work hard enough." The bad news is, poor people in America work hard and stay poor.
So, should health care be only for those who can afford it? Should the benefits of America's development go only to America's rich?
I don't pretend to know how to "fix" America's health care. I'm just saying that conservatives should understand that health and justice are linked. And justice for the poor matters a whole lot to a certain 1st century rabbi that seems to get people elected a lot...
And remember, its always the children of the poor that suffer anyway. Even if kids get health care, imagine what happens to the kids in a family that is already poor and a parent gets sick and can't work.
To end, some exhortations:
1. Christians in America, think eternally for a second. Christ endures, America dies. Think about the ethical/political implications of that!
2. Think about who really benefits from your political views: the rich or the poor? Then think, between those two groups, who does Jesus want justice for? (Open your Bibles to Luke 6:24-27, underline it like a good evangelical, and just stare at it for a while. If you're a Christian and you're going to defend the rights of an economic class, it has to be the poor.)
3. Figure out what the presuppositions of your political views are! Then, examine your presuppositions!
4. Seek truth in politics, not victory!
"Justice is what love looks like in public." -Dr. Cornell West
Grace and peace (and apologies if I'm not graceful or peaceful enough),
Charles
matthew was not a gardener.
13 hours ago